Would not the speed of a light beam headed toward a black hole increase tremendously? We do know it could be bent by the gravity of a star.
Asked by: Joe Thomas
Answer
Contrary to intuition, the speed of light (properly defined) decreases as the
black hole is approached. In fact, one way to understand the bending of light by the gravitational field of
a star is to regard it as resulting from the refraction of the wavefront due to the fact that
the part of the wavefront that is nearer to the star moves more slowly than the part farther
away from the star. The result is that the direction of advance of the wavefront is deflected
toward (or around) the star.
If the photon, the 'particle' of light, is thought of as behaving like a massive object, it
would indeed be accelerated to higher speeds as it falls toward a black hole. However, the
photon has no mass and so behaves in a manner that is not intuitively obvious.
The reason for the qualification 'properly defined' above is that the speed of light depends
upon the vantage point (frame of reference) of the observer. When we say that the speed of
light is decreased, we mean from the perspective of an observer fixed relative to the black
hole and at an essentially infinite distance. On the contrary, to an observer free falling
into the black hole, the speed of light, measured locally, would be unaltered from the
standard value of c.
Most of us have heard of the result
from _special_ relativity that the speed of light is the same for all
observers in inertial frames.
The result is _not_ the same in general relativity. In general
relativity, the statement becomes that the speed of light is the same
(i.e., good old 'c') for all observers in _local_ inertial frames.
Local inertial frames in general relativity are just those frames of
reference in which the observer is in gravitational free fall. A
fancy way of looking at it is that the _local_ frame of reference of
a free falling observer corresponds to a small patch of _flat_
spacetime tangent to the globally curved spacetime. As long as the
observer confines measurements to a small enough local region, the
approximation provided by the small tangent patch of flat spacetime
can be made to be an arbitrarily good approximation to the true
spacetime, which is actually curved in the main. The speed of light
in flat spacetime is, of course, the usual value of c.
For example, if one had a closed laboratory in orbit (i.e., in free
fall) around the earth and one did an experiment inside that
laboratory to measure the speed of light, one would get the usual
published value of c. All such observers would get one and the same
value for c.
If, however, the distance through which the light travelled in the
course of measuring its speed was too great, the deviation of the
reference frame from being 'flat' would become apparent. That is,
gravitational effects would begin to become apparent.
So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is _not_ constant
in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle,
applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference].
If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the
gravitational field of stars. One can do a simple Huyghens
reconstruction of a wave front, taking into account the different
speed of advance of the wavefront at different distances from the
star (variation of speed of light), to derive the deflection of the
light by the star.
Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in:
'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,'
Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911.
which predated the full formal development of general relativity by
about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You
can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle
of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's
derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational
potential, eqn (3). The result is,
c' = c_{0} ( 1 + V / c^{2} )
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where
the speed of light c_{0} is measured.
You can find a more sophisticated result derived later by Einstein
from the full general theory in the weak field approximation in the
book:
'The Meaning of Relativity,' A. Einstein, Princeton University Press
(1955). See pp. 92-93, eqn (107).
This book is widely available, and should be in your university
library.
A non-mathematical discussion of this can be found in:
'The Riddle of Gravitation,' Peter G. Bergmann, Charles Scribner's
Sons, NY (1987).
See, in particular, pages 65-66 and, especially, the first full
paragraph on page 66. Here, Bergmann takes the deflection of light
by the gravitational field of a star as evidence of the decreased
speed of light in a gravitational field.
The speed of light is _not_ constant in a gravitational field, but depends upon
the reference frame of the observer. An observer anywhere in free fall will
measure (locally) the traditional value of c. An observer
sufficiently far away from the source of the field will conclude
likewise that the speed of light is c (locally). But, the observer
far away from the source will likewise conclude that the speed of
light closer in to the source decreases as the source is approached.
Answered by: Warren Davis, Ph.D., President, Davis Associates, Inc., Newton, MA USA
'A theory with mathematical beauty is more likely to be correct than an ugly one that fits some experimental data. God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.'